White Council

Re: Speaking of Orcrist... | White Council Forum Archive - msg 10743

White Council Forum Archive
Original Xenite.Org White Council Forum Archive

Site Map


All Archives Top White Council Archive Index Archive 53 Index


VISIT LIVE TOLKIEN FORUM
Topic: Re: Speaking of Orcrist...    Reply to: msg 10739
Posted: April 01, 2000 at 20:30:08: by Aelmer
: : : The thread about Glamdring and Orcrist got me wondering something. How could Thorin have wielded Orcrist? If it was a main battle sword designed for lords of the Noldor, wouldn't it have been too bulky for Thorin to have carried comfortably, much less used? Hobbits were supposed to be "a little shorter than Dwarves," yet a dagger sufficed for a short sword for Bilbo. I'd love some insight from some of you weaponry experts out there.

: : I don't claim to be weaponry expert. There are daggers, and then there are daggers. Some medieval and ancient daggers had blades up to 15 or more inches long.

: : Thorin wielding Orcrist doesn't present a problem in my opinion. I see Orcrist having a blade no longer than three feet. As such, Thorin could have wielded it in the manner of hand and one-half swor or a two handed sword. We know dwarves used mattocks and axes in combat. I think there are references to two-handed use. However, it is pretty much a moot point since I don't remember Thorin ever having the opportunity to weild Orcrist in combat.

: He didn't wield it at the battle of five armies?

No. Thanduril's elves took it from him at the time of his capture in Mirkwood. It was returned placed with Thorin in his tomb following his death.

: As to physically wielding it - I don't see a problem either, I picture the dwarfs, though short, as having human sized hands so the hilt wouldn't be a problem, as to the length, one needs only to look at those god-awful two-handed claymores the Scotties used to fight with, not to mention the flamberge carried by German mercenaries which were commonly over 5 feet long, to know that sometimes longer is better...

: I too wonder how the orcs recognized the sword though... it would have to be from the runes, which would mean grunt-level orcs are rune-literate, unless the legend of the sword had been passed down with such a meticulous description (hard to imagine that quality among orcs) that it was burned into their minds - perhaps used in bedtime stories to frightne orclets?

: I also wonder about their glowing when enemies were near, I mean what was it that set them off? the smell?

I don't think the great goblin took time to look at or read any runes. When he saw the sword he recognized it. I also appears that the goblins who took the sword from Thorin did not recognize it. It seems they would have told the great goblin something like 'he was carrying Orcrist' and not 'he was carrying this', if they had.

I always thought the glowing of the sword's blade was somehow linked to the presence of Morgorth's evil taint, or something like that.



Contact us | SF Fandom | Privacy Statement


SF Fandom Sites

SciFi Forums
Archives
Forum Short Addresses
Other SciFi Sites

Xenite.Org Network

Science Fiction & Fantasy
SF Fandom
SF Worlds
The Queen of Swords
Tolkien Studies

Popular Network Sites

Entertainment Search Engine
Grace Park
Harry Potter News
History of Xena
Lord of the Rings News
Mizuo Peck
Poster Store
SciFi Search Engine
Star Wars News
White Cheese Dip
Witch World Page
Xena: Warrior Princess
 

This page is copyright © 1997-2007 by Michael L. Martinez. All rights reserved.
No portions of this page may be reproduced electronically or otherwise without express permission from the copyright holder, except as occurs in normal browser caching and page indexing.

No random scifi pages were incorporated into this archive. However, the truth about Balrogs may have been mentioned at least once. Learn more about Balrog of Moria. Read more Tolkien Essays.

Created by SEO Specialist Michael Martinez. Search engine optimization and search engine optimization provided by SE cOnsulting.