simonponting67 > February 3rd, 2024, 08:28 AM
Irene > February 3rd, 2024, 10:39 AM
Michael > February 3rd, 2024, 12:53 PM
RobRoy > February 5th, 2024, 08:48 PM
simonponting67 > February 6th, 2024, 09:17 AM
(February 3rd, 2024, 12:53 PM)Michael Wrote: I've actually asked ChatGPT to write some fan fiction scripts for me. They're short and true to form. I've toyed with the idea of having it write individual scenes based on my prompts and then stitching together a full script.
For Stargate SG-1, it did a pretty good job of mimicking the characters from the show. I don't know where it got the source material to do that. There must be a script archive online I haven't stumbled across.
(February 5th, 2024, 08:48 PM)RobRoy Wrote: Currently: No. Absolutely not. If you're considering Dalton Trumbo or James Cameron or [insert name here] to be the pinnacle of script-writing, then AI cannot currently achieve what they achieve, and you will know it's not achieving that.
In the future: Possibly.
Right now, there is very little I in AI. That is, the computer system is attempting to place the next most logical word in a series. When you're asking it for something generally factual, it does just fine. Sometimes the next most logical word doesn't actually exist, because there is a gap in the AIs database, which is what results in AI hallucinations and errors. It will fill that gap, based on other logical solutions, but that's not reality.
There are additional problems of voice and creativity. Both of those things come from years of living, experiencing, and attempting to communicate that to others. If you feed the AI enough base material in the same voice and from the same creative mind, it will start to spit back out similar works. The more advanced the system, the closer it can get to mimicking another voice and seeming creative.
I use AI right now for my job, which is marketing/writing. It does a fantastic job when I'm working on resumes, case studies, and easier technical explanations. When I feed it my companies boilerplate, it can generally improve on that for readability and flow. This saves me minutes and eventually hours of effort that I otherwise would have to put into reading, drafting, redrafting and getting edits and approvals.
Eventually, I can see a writer feeding an advanced AI their body of work, and then working with that AI to generate creative outputs that could potentially rival better-than-average scripts or novels. The writer will still need to do a great deal of work, but given what I'm seeing, it's not that far off.
Michael > February 12th, 2024, 03:59 AM
RobRoy > February 14th, 2024, 12:01 PM
(February 12th, 2024, 03:59 AM)Michael Wrote: I think there is a growing consensus around the use of AI tools to create outlines and help clean up copy, but not to use them to create high-value content.
THAT said, I read a legal paper this weekend that argues there probably isn't much protection for creators against AI systems being trained on their works.
So we may be in for a long period of cat-and-mouse with AI-generated content.
badlands > February 25th, 2024, 10:39 PM
Michael > February 26th, 2024, 12:50 AM
RobRoy > February 26th, 2024, 12:52 PM
(February 26th, 2024, 12:50 AM)Michael Wrote: badlands, let me introduce you to Sora.
https://openai.com/sora
Not yet available to the public, this new video-generating AI produces content so realistic that Tyler Perry put an $800 million studio expanson on hold.
AI could be a real threat to the film and television industries.
Michael > February 29th, 2024, 01:36 AM
RobRoy > February 29th, 2024, 02:59 PM
(February 29th, 2024, 01:36 AM)Michael Wrote: I read a new paper a couple of days ago that argues AI hallucination cannot be prevented. So if those researchers are correct, all of this AI-generated content is probably going to be short-lived. The tools will probably have to be used in limited ways to enhance human creativity rather than replace it.
simonponting67 > March 5th, 2024, 10:32 AM
(February 3rd, 2024, 08:28 AM)simonponting67 Wrote: hi all
wild thoughts: can ai driven things or lets say everyone goto 'CHAT GPT' be a good script writer as good as Trumbo or James Cameron or anyone.
(February 6th, 2024, 09:17 AM)simonponting67 Wrote:(February 3rd, 2024, 12:53 PM)Michael Wrote: I've actually asked ChatGPT to write some fan fiction scripts for me. They're short and true to form. I've toyed with the idea of having it write individual scenes based on my prompts and then stitching together a full script.
For Stargate SG-1, it did a pretty good job of mimicking the characters from the show. I don't know where it got the source material to do that. There must be a script archive online I haven't stumbled across.
somewhat they might be near to okay but can't be accurate and perfect.
(February 5th, 2024, 08:48 PM)RobRoy Wrote: Currently: No. Absolutely not. If you're considering Dalton Trumbo or James Cameron or [insert name here] to be the pinnacle of script-writing, then AI cannot currently achieve what they achieve, and you will know it's not achieving that.
In the future: Possibly.
Right now, there is very little I in AI. That is, the computer system is attempting to place the next most logical word in a series. When you're asking it for something generally factual, it does just fine. Sometimes the next most logical word doesn't actually exist, because there is a gap in the AIs database, which is what results in AI hallucinations and errors. It will fill that gap, based on other logical solutions, but that's not reality.
There are additional problems of voice and creativity. Both of those things come from years of living, experiencing, and attempting to communicate that to others. If you feed the AI enough base material in the same voice and from the same creative mind, it will start to spit back out similar works. The more advanced the system, the closer it can get to mimicking another voice and seeming creative.
I use AI right now for my job, which is marketing/writing. It does a fantastic job when I'm working on resumes, case studies, and easier technical explanations. When I feed it my companies boilerplate, it can generally improve on that for readability and flow. This saves me minutes and eventually hours of effort that I otherwise would have to put into reading, drafting, redrafting and getting edits and approvals.
Eventually, I can see a writer feeding an advanced AI their body of work, and then working with that AI to generate creative outputs that could potentially rival better-than-average scripts or novels. The writer will still need to do a great deal of work, but given what I'm seeing, it's not that far off.
brutally honest!
in the future it might be possible but again as you mentioned earlier and highlighted the issued like voice and creativity it seem like AI is far far away from this to happen, and hence he smarter and intellect the system would be the more accurate mimicry it would do.
Boomstick > April 7th, 2024, 12:54 PM
RobRoy > April 9th, 2024, 03:35 PM
(April 7th, 2024, 12:54 PM)Boomstick Wrote: I think I mentioned before, but I suspect a reaction by consumers is also going to play into this. Similar to how a "Made in USA" sticker is appealing to some people, a "written and produced by real people!" notice may be a selling point on entertainment in the near future.
Quote:It does present some interesting opportunities, although it remains to be seen if the results would be cool, or just creepy. The latest Beatles release used some sort of "machine learning" to replicate John Lennon's singing voice, at least to some extent. How far this technology can actually go, I don't know. But I can't help imagining photo realistic CGI movies starring bygone actors. Like a swashbuckler starring Errol Flynn and Yvonne DeCarlo in their prime.
Quote:Or another Sam Spade or Phillip Marlowe movie starring Bogart.
Michael > April 15th, 2024, 01:33 AM