Arkie > March 4th, 2003, 03:24 AM
Stripe > March 4th, 2003, 05:31 AM
Coconut Ent > March 4th, 2003, 11:04 PM
CJ~ > March 4th, 2003, 11:17 PM
Quote:A PG-13 film is one which, in the view of the Rating Board, leaps beyond the boundaries of the PG rating in theme, violence, nudity, sensuality, language, or other contents, but does not quite fit within the restricted R category. Any drug use content will initially require at least a PG-13 rating. In effect, the PG-13 cautions parents with more stringency than usual to give special attention to this film before they allow their 12-year olds and younger to attend.
If nudity is sexually oriented, the film will generally not be found in the PG-13 category. If violence is too rough or persistent, the film goes into the R (restricted) rating. A film's single use of one of the harsher sexually-derived words, though only as an expletive, shall initially require the Rating Board to issue that film at least a PG-13 rating. More than one such expletive must lead the Rating Board to issue a film an R rating, as must even one of these words used in a sexual context
An R-rated film may include hard language, or tough violence, or nudity within sensual scenes, or drug abuse or other elements, or a combination of some of the above, so that parents are counseled, in advance, to take this advisory rating very seriously. Parents must find out more about an R-rated movie before they allow their teenagers to view it.
Stripe > March 4th, 2003, 11:23 PM
Coconut Ent > March 5th, 2003, 01:04 AM
CJ~ > March 5th, 2003, 09:25 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Coconut Ent
Can I have some examples? Would "Highlander" minus the sole lovemaking scene merit pg-13? And how come Star Wars can get away with Vader hacking off Luke's hand and be rated 'U'?
Coconut Ent > March 6th, 2003, 12:36 AM
Quote:Originally posted by CJ~
Wow good question. I know that here, Star Wars was rated PG. Actually it was put out before we even had PG13 rating. The old ratings system was G, PG, R and X. They've since expanded that to G, PG, PG13, R, and NC17.
So by today's standards, I believe that SW: Empire Strikes Back would most likely qualify for a PG13 rating.
CJ~ > March 6th, 2003, 10:54 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Coconut Ent
:::Note to self.... decapitations, amputations, mutilations qualify as PG-13 provided it is bloodless ::::
Coconut Ent > March 6th, 2003, 11:56 AM
Quote:Originally posted by CJ~
Yes but not more than one or two decapitations, amputations or mutilations!
Luthien_001 > March 7th, 2003, 04:22 PM
moif > March 7th, 2003, 09:10 PM
Luthien_001 > March 8th, 2003, 01:27 AM
Quote:Originally posted by moif
I have an idea for a horror story. Several people will die and their deaths will be described. Does this mean I can't post this story?
Luthien_001 > March 8th, 2003, 01:30 AM
moif > March 8th, 2003, 07:32 AM
Orlichick > March 31st, 2003, 01:29 AM
moif > March 31st, 2003, 07:42 AM
Lex > May 26th, 2003, 02:09 AM
Orlichick > May 27th, 2003, 04:06 PM
CJ~ > May 28th, 2003, 11:45 AM